Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever." He said these things while he was teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum.
When many of his disciples heard it, they said, "This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?" But Jesus, being aware that his disciples were complaining about it, said to them, "Does this offend you? Then what if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life; the flesh is useless. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But among you there are some who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the first who were the ones that did not believe, and who was the one that would betray him. And he said, "For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted by the Father."
Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. So Jesus asked the twelve, "Do you also wish to go away?" Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom can we go? You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe and know that you are the Holy One of God."
In our text for today Jesus is teaching in the synagogue and when he’s done a bunch of his followers say “This teaching is haaaard.” and Jesus is like, O I’m sorry, does this offend you?” and several of them left right there on the spot. He then asks “Do you also want to leave?” and Peter replies “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life”
As many of you know, my denomination – the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America met in church wide assembly this week. The highest governing body of the church. Among the business at hand was deciding on a full communion agreement with the United Methodists, which passed. And several historic decisions to be made around what this church’s stance is on issues of human sexuality. In the end, we approved a social statement as well as policy changes which now allow congregations to bless and hold publicly accountable those in same sex life long monogamous relationship as well as to call GLBTQ pastors in such relationships to serve as their clergy.
The debate on the floor between those at the green microphones who support these steps and those at the red microphones who reject these steps was sometimes inspired and sometimes insipid. Those in support urged the church to be open and loving as Jesus had been. Those opposed urged the church to heed the Bible. Both sides were passionate and faithful and I’m proud to say that throughout the debate the assembly paused every 20 minutes to pray together.
As an ELCA pastor serving you, a community committed to the full inclusion of all GLBTQ brothers and sisters in Christ, I watched the proceedings with my heart in my throat. If these policy changes hadn’t been approved I honestly had no idea what I could possible come back to you and say. Watching people’s comments I would try to fight off thoughts like “man, that guys an idiot” with more or less success. I watched people say prayerful things, hurtful things, thoughtful things, and idiotic things on both sides of the aisle. Yet there several of my friends were: standing faithfully at the Green microphones. Standing faithfully to make this church a house of prayer for ALL people. And I couldn’t help but think…if Jesus was here, he’d be standing in the green line. And then a young pastor got up to speak at the green microphone and the first thing he said, in a quivering voice was “anyone else frightened to speak? I’m shaking. Please pray for me” and the man standing right next to him in at the red microphone reached over and laid his hand on him and prayed while his brother of the opposing view point spoke. Then I knew that Jesus was really in between the red and green microphones. Not in some sort of neutral “Jesus as Switzerland” sort of way, but in the you must lose your life to gain it sort of way. Jesus is between the red and the green microphones…between the red and the blue states offering us life and salvation in the Words of eternal life and in the Sacrament of his own body and blood. Jesus right there between the liberals and conservatives speaking the word that the first shall be last and the last shall be first. Jesus standing there between those who are harmed and those doing the harming saying forgive as you have been forgiven.
Part of me is with the disciples who say These teaching are difficult, who can accept them? So when Jesus says Do you too want to leave….I think the only reasonable answer is well yeah. I do. cause these teachings are haaaard and I’m very aware of how much these policy changes mean to this community I love but I’m also aware of how painful these policy changes are to a minority in this denomination I love.
So after the vote went the way it did people keep calling and emailing and texting me saying “Are you celebrating? Aren’t you so happy we won?” I am, of course. But I am also deeply aware of the faithful people in the Lutheran church whose hearts are breaking and who now feel as though THEY are the alienated ones. So how do we celebrate?
To be sure today there are some places to go in the ELCA for super-gay triumphalism…but while celebrating a well won victory is understandable…these are not the words of eternal life.
To be sure there are some places today in the ELCA where you can hear the words of angry indignation and revolt….but while disappointment is understandable…. these are not the words of eternal life.
To whom shall we go?
Shall we go to partisanship? Shall we go to gurus or celebrities…or both- like Oprah? Surely Oprah has the words of eternal life.
To whom shall we go? Fox News? NPR? Shall we go to the self-help section of the tattered cover for the words of eternal life?
There are words of eternal life, but they are not our words. So Let us not go to ourselves because as deeply as we hold our beliefs about inclusion, or social justice, or as deeply as we hold our beliefs about social conservatism or personal morality…we do not have the words of eternal life. We have our beliefs, our convictions, our understandings of scripture and hear me clearly…these are not to be taken lightly or walked away from. But they are not the words of eternal life. Jesus, the true Word of God standing between red and green, points us to life and life abundant. Not the empty satisfaction of being right because we are the majority or because we are the righteous minority, but counter-intuitively the words of eternal life tell us that we must die. We must die to self and live to Christ.
At the beginning and the end of these debates Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson reminded us that “WE MEET ONE ANOTHER FINALLY, NOT IN OUR AGREEMENTS OR OUR DISAGREEMENTS, BUT AT THE FOOT OF THE CROSS. WHERE GOD IS FAITHFUL, WHERE CHRIST IS PRESENT WITH US, AND WHERE, BY THE POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, WE ARE ONE IN CHRIST.
So let’s again look to Christ and not ourselves because in the end there are no winners and losers, there is just what there has always been, the good news of Jesus Christ The Holy One of God. To whom else shall we go? He has the words of eternal life and offers all the inexplicable gift if his own self, body blood and word. And bid all come and eat.
So today church as we celebrate …. And there is reason to do so. Let us pray that the Lord make us one and have mercy on us all and let us recognize that he is already doing so. amen
One of the better sermons I have read from yesterday. Excellent job.
Posted by: Robb | August 24, 2009 at 03:38 AM
Thanks for a well reasoned response.
Dave
Posted by: Dave Zeman | August 24, 2009 at 05:00 AM
Thanks, Nadia. It was a good, haaard week.
Posted by: A Twitter User | August 24, 2009 at 06:17 AM
Excellent response and a great word picture of what went on at assembly. I am still teary.
Posted by: angela | August 24, 2009 at 07:19 AM
Amen. Thanks, Nadia.
Posted by: Beau Surratt | August 24, 2009 at 07:44 AM
Thank you for putting it all in perspective.
Posted by: Jaime | August 24, 2009 at 07:56 AM
Beautiful.
Posted by: Meredith Gould | August 24, 2009 at 08:50 AM
Nadia, thanks. You nailed what this week was about for me. I emailed a link to this to "red mic guy" (aka John). He had a haaard week, but made it much less haaard (and also haaarder) for me ("green mic guy").
Posted by: +Erik Samuelson | August 24, 2009 at 09:49 AM
Funny how you were able to use the text in conjunction with the CWA. A lot of people didn't seem to be able. Thanks.
Posted by: John Dornheim | August 24, 2009 at 09:58 AM
mmm... nicely done. there indeed has to be a way to move forward together.
Posted by: hot cup | August 24, 2009 at 10:03 AM
Amen, Nadia. I've thought more than once that this text was particularly appropriate for our time this weekend. Thanks for this inspiring word.
Posted by: Scott | August 24, 2009 at 10:21 AM
This made me a bit teary too.
Posted by: Clare | August 24, 2009 at 11:15 AM
Amen! Have shared your post with others in our independent Catholic community. Thank you . . .
Posted by: Elaine Groppenbacher | August 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Beautifully written... and it sounded wonderful in my mine"s ear
Posted by: Jerry | August 24, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Thank you Nadia.
Posted by: Andy | August 24, 2009 at 03:32 PM
Excellent post. If you have a moment, please see another reflection on the ELCA action, "A Step Forward for Lutherans" at:
http://ehlersoneverything.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Mark | August 24, 2009 at 07:30 PM
'Die to self and live to Christ'. This is what it all boils down to. And man do I know it IS haaard. Great post.
Posted by: Karen | August 25, 2009 at 05:02 AM
many thanks Nadia for sharing this - really good stuff. Looking forward to catching up at Greenbelt. peace Ian
Posted by: Ian Adams | August 25, 2009 at 09:16 AM
Great stuff, Nadia.
Posted by: Steve Thorngate | August 26, 2009 at 08:47 AM
Amen! Thank you for again reminding us of the truth.
Posted by: Padi | August 26, 2009 at 09:43 AM
Nadia
To leave the ELCA is an act of faith, not rebellion. These politcal measures passed by the weight of the ELCA institution could only produce winners and losers.
Posted by: douglas | August 26, 2009 at 01:00 PM
Well said. In my neck of the woods where folks are conservative and unsure of whether or not they've won or lost, it is good to know that we can all meet at God's table and the foot of the cross.
Posted by: imngrace | August 27, 2009 at 08:45 AM
Is Homosexual sex a sin?
Is a GLBTQ pastor in a lifelong monogamous relationship repentant (if its a sin)?
Is it OK, proper, wise to appoint a non-repentant sinner (yes we're all equally sinful in God's eyes, I get that) leading a congregation?
That's what this came down to for me? Of course we want to welcome everyone to God's table. Welcome all, pray together, confess together... But to have someone who is not seeking forgiveness for their sins (any sin!!) is where I get hung up? Help me past that! I truly pray for understanding on how that can be OK.
Posted by: ARedMicDude | August 27, 2009 at 02:05 PM
Great sermon, Nadia -- I just might steal a little bit of it for one of mine!
Posted by: Eddie | August 29, 2009 at 09:27 AM
Can you answer a question. Our church bulletin this morning stated that ". . . voted to endorse gay marriage . . ." I am not completely up to date on everything that was addressed at the CWA, but I did not think that endorsing gay marriage was. The current decisions certainly pave the way, but was the subject of gay marriage specifically endorsed?
You can tell, that my church is rebelling against these decisions. Well, actually the pastors have made up their minds and will most certainly convince our congregation to leave the ELCA. They already have on the agenda for our congregational meeting the intention to introduce motions to affiliate with either CORE or LCMC.
My heart is heavy with sadness at this. I love my church community, but I have to wait, pray, and see what God has in mind for us.
Nadia, thank you for your insightful words.
For reference, I belong to a large ELCA congregation in mostly conservative Orange County, California. Perhaps it is time for me to go back to my roots and find a smaller, struggling, congregation for worship.
Sorry to hijack your comments.
Posted by: Kathy B | August 30, 2009 at 09:41 AM
Will the ELCA now teach our youth that homosexual sex is not a sin? Has the bible been misinterpreted? Are we to now pick and chose what the bible says is sin and is not sin? Has the ELCA become moral relevatists? Now that the celebration is over serious questions need answers.
Posted by: Chuck | August 31, 2009 at 06:38 PM
The Sojourners version of your sermon was a bit more polarizing than what is printed here. However, the point still holds - be very careful of what is defined as a "majority." Is it a majority of ELCA members? Maybe or maybe not. Yes, it was a majority of voters at the CWA. Unfortunately, that is no guarantee that the delegates are anywhere near the rank and file. Time will tell. I am still not sure where I stand, since I can see good sense on both "sides" of the issue. However, I am very glad to be a musician since there is not a "sexuality" section in any of the songbooks I use. I just help people sing the faith.
Posted by: John Krueger | September 01, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Nadia, Your sermon is very meaningful for me as we unfortunately had the opposite result in our denomination on this issue. I am Presbyterian (PC(USA)) and the decision around ordination of GLBTQ men and women passed our General Assembly in 2008 but was turned down by the presbyteries in 2009. So it is onward to the next GA (2010) and another attempt to change the Book of Order to allow ordination for GLBTQ men and women in our denomination. Meanwhile, I will keep your sermon in mind as I work to discern this issue with those of more conservative convictions.
Posted by: Janet L. Bohren | September 01, 2009 at 06:41 PM
No, the ELCA did NOT endorse gay marriage. Read the resolution!
And for anyone who still believes this to be per se unbiblical: why are we getting so fundamentalist about this one issue? This sermon, this blog is written by a WOMAN pastor - doesn't the Bible say women are to keep silent and submissive in church? Last but not least: when was the last time you saw a divorced and remarried pastor be required to turn in his/her collar? Christ Himself had some things to say about that.
Let's not be hypocritical here. Wonderful sermon, Pastor.
Posted by: Shari | September 03, 2009 at 01:50 PM
I have been a Christian all of my life and I fully believe and cling to the doctrinal stance of grace and forgiveness for all. There is clearly forgiveness for all sin by the blood of Jesus. Sin, in any form, is wrong. This is why churches have a "big tent" and accept the sinner while helping them to receive God's forgiveness and strength and move past their sin. Biological tendencies do not negate the Bible's position on sin. Sin is wrong no matter what your particular tendencies may be. In my opinion, what happened at the ELCA conference was a calculated move to condone sin based on the "big tent" mentality that grace is sufficient for the remission of sin. However Jesus called his disciples to turn away from sin. The ELCA has taken a position of rewarding sinful behavior by allowing openly sinful ministers to teach others that is perfectly OK to sin. How can that possibly be consistent with anything in scripture and how can any congregation accept that the basics of Christianity are not crushed by this decision.
Posted by: Jim | September 06, 2009 at 11:37 AM
I fully agree with Jim's post. I have been Lutheran since birth, but now am evaluating Catholic. What was done is just simply wrong. It is HARDER to do the right thing -- they will persecute you, but I am taking a stand.
Posted by: Galen | September 06, 2009 at 08:18 PM
I am so happy I have found this blog and I can't wait to share it with my family and friends. I have to go read more...
Posted by: kelli | September 07, 2009 at 08:28 AM
Ha, I want to say that a Lutheran from birth turned Catholic (esp. Roman Catholic) would make Luther turn over in his grave, but so would this resolution...
Posted by: www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=663718276 | September 27, 2009 at 06:45 AM
Beautifully articulated. And an excellent reminder for whenever people of faith disagree.
Posted by: TriciaGray | September 29, 2009 at 10:58 AM
As I have reminded elsewhere, I and those like me are not a "side" or an "issue" we are human beings made in the image of God and in my case, a baptized brother in Christ. Using "sides" and "issues" allows for a pretend objectivity and neutrality that ends up objectifying the persons over whom everyone is fighting and then uses us for various purposes. It is unethical.
Posted by: Christopher | October 10, 2009 at 03:06 PM
Thank you so much for your words. I too watched churchwide assembly with my heart in my throat, and I love your reflections on that miraculous-yet-human event.
Posted by: Jen | October 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM
I just stumbled across this blog and this sermon, and find myself wishing I'd done so sooner.
My own perspective on the ELCA's decision was shaped by the fact that I'd walked away from the ELCA several years before as a way of protesting the fact that my gay cousin and gay best friend were excluded from full participation in the life of the church. I felt the need to stand in solidarity with them, which for me meant leaving the church.
The August decision forced me to wrestle with that choice in a new way, and to think of what to do next (a struggle that I expressed in this Religion Dispatches article: http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/sexandgender/1782/on_the_elca%E2%80%99s_historic_shift_to_include_gay_clergy%3A_reflections_of_a_self-exiled_lutheran).
I finally made the decision to return to the ELCA, but with lingering questions about what I could and should do for this community under God. This sermon has helped shape my thinking.
Posted by: Eric Reitan | November 04, 2009 at 12:26 PM
In the uefa punishment jose mourinho, real Madrid after submitted ShenSuZhuang, uefa accepted the real Madrid's appeal, June 30, jose mourinho can appeal at uefa member of the committee, for his speech before a argued. However, real Madrid club, some worry that, this might be just uefa a ZouGuoChang steps, to jose mourinho's punishment ease is unlikely. Real Madrid for uefa appeal committee didn't hold much hope, in fact the club recently have been ready to uefa against international sports arbitration court. Real Madrid for this also engaged in for the winning cases bosman Belgian famous lawyer dupont as jose mourinho defense lawyers. Josasdfe mourinho believes, international sports arbitration court as a democratic nature of the institution, with will give myself a reasonable.
Posted by: true religion oultet | June 11, 2011 at 01:15 AM