26Then an angel of the Lord said to Philip, "Get up and go toward the south to the road that goes down from Jerusalem to Gaza." (This is a wilderness road.) 27So he got up and went. Now there was an Ethiopian eunuch, a court official of the Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, in charge of her entire treasury. He had come to Jerusalem to worship 28and was returning home; seated in his chariot, he was reading the prophet Isaiah. 29Then the Spirit said to Philip, "Go over to this chariot and join it." 30So Philip ran up to it and heard him reading the prophet Isaiah. He asked, "Do you understand what you are reading?" 31He replied, "How can I, unless someone guides me?" And he invited Philip to get in and sit beside him. 32Now the passage of the scripture that he was reading was this:
"Like a sheep he was led to the slaughter,
and like a lamb silent before its shearer, so he does not open his mouth.
33In his humiliation justice was denied him.
Who can describe his generation? For his life is taken away from the earth."
34The eunuch asked Philip, "About whom, may I ask you, does the prophet say this, about himself or about someone else?" 35Then Philip began to speak, and starting with this scripture, he proclaimed to him the good news about Jesus. 36As they were going along the road, they came to some water; and the eunuch said, "Look, here is water! What is to prevent me from being baptized?" 38He commanded the chariot to stop, and both of them, Philip and the eunuch, went down into the water, and Philip baptized him. 39When they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord snatched Philip away; the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing. 40But Philip found himself at Azotus, and as he was passing through the region, he proclaimed the good news to all the towns until he came to Caesarea.
As many of you know, last week Seth and I attended the Rocky Mountain Synod assembly – the legislative body for this region of the Lutheran church. For more than 10 years my denomination has been talking about human sexuality. Much like the early church who were convinced that gentiles could only become Christians if they changed into being Jews first (which, for the record, involved a rather unpleasant process), much like our first century brothers and sisters there is a segment of the church today who thinks that if we extend the roof of the tent to include “the gays” then the whole thing will come crashing down around us. We must “evangelize” them – ie. change them into us before they will fit. Or else the roof can’t hold. Meanwhile the other side of the church is all about “inclusion”. We must extend the tent to include the marginalized, the less fortunate the minorities.
But then we have this story of Phillip and The Ethiopian Eunuch. A text which I have always heard as being about evangelism. “The conversion of the Ethiopian Eunuch” it was called. I was always told that the message of this text was that we should tell everyone we meet about Jesus because in doing so we might save them. We might convert them. We might change them into being us.
But today I’m not so sure. Because if the Eunuch was reading Isaiah as he returned from Jerusalem having gone there to worship – see if he was reading Isaiah then I would bet he was also familiar with Dueteronomy, specifically 23:1 “No one whose testicles are cut off or whose penis is cut off shall be admitted to the assembly of the Lord” Anyone have that one as a memory verse growing up?
This law strictly forbids a Eunuch from entering the assembly of the Lord. Their transgression of gender binaries and the inability to fit in proper categories made them profane by nature. They do not fit in the tent. But the Eunuch went to Jerusalem to worship despite the fact that in all likelihood he would be turned away by the religious establishment. The Eunuch sought God anyway.
See, when the Spirit guided Phillip to that road in the desert I like to think she guided him to his own conversion. As he approached the chariot he may have been thinking OK…I’ll just beat him with the scripture stick until he becomes what I am comfortable with. But when Phillip joined this person who sought to worship God despite his exclusion form the tent, maybe it was Phillip himself who was converted to the faith. It was perhaps even a mutual conversion. Maybe because they simply asked each other questions in the desert. The only imperatives came from the Holy Spirit. Phillip and the Eunuch only asked each other questions. The only commands came from God and the command was go and join. Go and join the other. What we don’t know is if the Spirit also gave the Eunuch a command to invite. Invite this nice Jewish boy – representative of all that clings to the law and rejects you from God’s house. Invite him to sit by you. Go…join…invite…ask questions. Perhaps Phillip in his encounter with this gender transgressive foreigner learned what seeking the Lord looks like.
A couple weeks ago Stuart showed up to liturgy wearing slacks and button down shirt rather than his Grease Monkey jacket and jeans. Earlier that day He had stood as Godfather and baptismal sponsor for the child of his friends’ ; a straight couple who have known Stuart for a number of years. Apparently after the baptism there was a little reception back at this couple’s house. To Stuart’s surprise his friends got all of their guests attention so they could say a few words about why they had chosen Stuart as their child’s godparent. “We chose you Stuart” they said “because for most of your life you have pursued Christ and Christ’s church even though as a Gay Man all you’ve heard from the church is that ‘there is no love for you here’”. I heard that story as his friends saying to him “you, Stuart convert us again and again to this faith”
All many of you have heard is that the tent is simply not big enough unless you change to fit in it. Change your sexuality, your personality your doubting. Change your addictive patterns, your story, your brokenness. And if you can’t, then just pretend. Yet here you are. Converting me once again to this faith.
Because how can I know what it means to follow Christ unless I learn it from someone who has done so despite every obstacle possible? That’s why I am so in awe of those in our community who have heard again and again “there is no love for you here unless you let us change you into who we feel comfortable with you being”. Not just the queers either. Also those who have the wrong personality or the wrong socio economic status or the wrong gender or the wrong immigration status or the wrong politics to fit under the tent.
I think maybe that we can’t actually know what this Jesus following thing is about unless we too have the stranger show us. This is far more than “inclusion”. Inclusion isn’t the right word at all because it sounds like in our niceness and virtue we are allowing “them” to join us - like we are judging another group of people to be worthy to be a part of this thing. “inclusion” seems like a small thing. A charity. A mercy. But the truth is that We need the equivalent of our Ethiopian Eunuch to show us the faith. We continually need the stranger, the foreigner, the “other” to show us water in the desert. We need to hear “Here is water in the desert, so what is to keep me the eunuch from being baptized” or me the queer or me the intersexed, or me the illiterate or me the neurotic or me the over-educated or me the founder of Focus on the Family. Until we face the difficulty of that question and come up as Phillip did with no answer…until then we just look at the seemingly limited space under the tent and either think it’s our job to change people so they fit or its our job to extend the roof so that they fit. Either way, it’s misguided because …it’s not our tent. It’s God’s tent. The wideness of the tent of the Lord should concern us only insofaras it points to the gracious nature of a loving God who became flesh and entered into our humanity. The wideness of the tent should only concern us insofaras it points to the great mercy and love of a God who welcomes us all as friends.
The bigness of God’s tent is why we have an open communion table. When we come to the table we all come as Christ’s guests to his feast. And as much as we’d like to be - we are not the makers of the guest list. We come to the table with those who accept us and those who reject us. We come to the table with those we love and those we distrust. We come whether or not we feel worthy. Because It is God who has made us worthy in the invitation. It is God who has torn the curtain of the temple so that there is no longer Jew nor Greek, Slave nor free, Male nor Female gay nor straight. Liberal nor conservative.
So maybe here in this story of the conversion of Phillip and the Eunuch is some hope for the church. That under God’s really big tent we might ask questions, invite those who represent the establishment to come and sit by us, to stay in the scriptures, to be converted anew by the strange and the stranger, to see where there is water in the desert, to enter fully into the waters of God’s mercy with the foreigners, with the “not us”. And to go on our way rejoicing having converted each other to this beautiful, dangerous expansive life of faith.
Thank you, Nadia, for a very insightful sermon. i have never heard a sermon on this passage before and yours gives me much food for thought in how i am to react/treat those who are set out to not allow me into the tent of G-D; my own enemies.
i like what you said about inclusion: ' I think maybe that we can’t actually know what this Jesus following thing is about unless we too have the stranger show us. This is far more than “inclusion”. Inclusion isn’t the right word at all because it sounds like in our niceness and virtue we are allowing “them” to join us - like we are judging another group of people to be worthy to be a part of this thing. “inclusion” seems like a small thing. A charity. A mercy. But the truth is that We need the equivalent of our Ethiopian Eunuch to show us the faith. We continually need the stranger, the foreigner, the “other” to show us water in the desert.' It is similar to what i read somewhere recently about tolerance. Being tolerated means someone else is naming what is normative and abnormal, thus being charitable to extend tolerance to those they deem out of the norm. Who are they to define what is normal?
Also, your sermon very much reminds me of Ikon in Belfast's evangelism project. With this they visit other faith communities, not to evangelize, but to BE evangelized further along in their own conversion by listening and learning.
i feel like we tend to busy ourselves with our Father/Mother's business and don't take much time to reflect on our own stuff so that we allow the Divine to transform us so we can be more loving creatures.
Again, THANK YOU, for this thought-provoking sermon. i will be chewing on and mulling over this for quite a while.
Warmest Regards,
EP
Posted by: Existential Punk | May 11, 2009 at 12:35 AM
thanks nadia. i was at a church this evening that was, how can i say, oppressively inclusive? and happy mother's day!
cara
Posted by: caralyn | May 11, 2009 at 12:41 AM
Great Sermon.
Posted by: Account Deleted | May 11, 2009 at 05:00 AM
WOW.
Really really really amazing. Thank you, for giving voice to beautiful otherness that actually, upon further inspection, is just us if we give way to it. Like EP, I will be chewing on this for a while.
Posted by: Rachel | May 11, 2009 at 05:20 AM
Very good. I'm a little envious that you can be so open about the connection between the kingdom being open to eunuchs and gays and lesbians. Here in Iowa, I tread a little more lightly - I also preached on this text and just have to pray that the Spirit will open some to see the connection - council tonight wants to put something in our CONSTITUTION about marriage being between a man and a woman. I think once they find out they will have to change their entire constitution to match the model to do that it will put the kabash on that but we will see...
Posted by: Joelle | May 11, 2009 at 05:55 AM
Excellent! Love the connection to Communion.
Posted by: Brian | May 11, 2009 at 06:25 AM
This is fantastic. Thank you.
Posted by: Carolyn | May 11, 2009 at 06:43 AM
Great job with this Nadia. It's one of my favorite texts to preach on in a variety of contexts because of that very, "We are evangelized as we evangelize" aspect.
As a missiologically oriented theologian, this text fulfills the Great Commission far more than any other scriptural text. And far more than triumphantalistic interpretations of Christian (European) expansionism that didn't even begin to become fashionable or widely thought in Christianity until the European colonial project was well underway.
Instead, it reflects the foundation of earlier ideas of mission whereby the missionary is a receiver of the gospel and a merely a participant in grace that already exists "out there" in God's world.
Conversion by violating bodies--whether those of individuals, societal bodies, or the great body of creation--is no conversion at all.
Posted by: Kirk VanGilder | May 11, 2009 at 08:17 AM
That was lovely and so beautiful! Thank you.
Posted by: Lyz | May 11, 2009 at 03:52 PM
Wonderful. Reminded me of Josh Ritter's Song "Thin Blue Flame": 'Only a full house gonna have a prayer.'
Posted by: Jeni Grangaard | May 11, 2009 at 07:25 PM
Found this sermon through Rachel at The Sweet Bi and Bi, and I'm so glad I did.
Complicated and simple at the same time, and very, very beautiful.
Posted by: Tess | May 12, 2009 at 12:26 PM
I agree with Tess...
I also have the great call to preach and what really gets me excited is to see old things in a fresh way (ie the OT rules against eunuchs) maybe this is what draws me to the emerging church so much.
http://deartheoph.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Jaymes | May 13, 2009 at 01:41 AM
Your sermon brought tears to my eyes. I gave a sermon that day too--with half the insight I feel like a little girl.
I've been praying for two years and the Spirit has lead me to believe what you say though I've been struggling with how to say it. Blessings.
Posted by: Angela | May 17, 2009 at 06:28 AM
From a Lutheran in England to a Lutheran in America: Glad to have found you.
Posted by: Doorman-Priest | May 18, 2009 at 11:45 AM
You really have a way with words. I enjoyed reading this. You are so bold! Good for you! Keep up the work of the Kingdom. It is beautiful.
Posted by: Theresa Seeber | May 18, 2009 at 02:49 PM
Thank you! Wonder-full!
Posted by: Betty Navta | May 21, 2009 at 09:01 AM
That was an absolutely wonderful point of view on a very interesting story.
Posted by: Randy | August 09, 2009 at 03:02 PM
Thank you for posting this sermon. it seems, our Lutheran Church in Finland is battling with the same questions as your church. This sermon opened up a new view of an old Bible Story and I already passed the link to a couple of my friends. I hope that is ok with you.
Posted by: Terhi Paananen | December 09, 2009 at 12:16 PM
COULD ANYONE PLEASE TELL ME WHERE THIS FRESCO IS FROM????
Posted by: VAG | December 25, 2010 at 09:09 PM